{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Humanitarian Law &amp; Policy Blog","provider_url":"https:\/\/blogs.icrc.org\/law-and-policy\/zh\/","author_name":"ppakter","author_url":"https:\/\/blogs.icrc.org\/law-and-policy\/zh\/author\/ppakter\/","title":"beyond-prevalence-figure-1 - \u4eba\u9053\u6cd5\u4e0e\u653f\u7b56\u535a\u5ba2","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ipxT5fnw5Q\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.icrc.org\/law-and-policy\/zh\/beyond-prevalence-figure-1-2\/\">beyond-prevalence-figure-1<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.icrc.org\/law-and-policy\/zh\/beyond-prevalence-figure-1-2\/embed\/#?secret=ipxT5fnw5Q\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;beyond-prevalence-figure-1&#8221; &#8212; Humanitarian Law &amp; Policy Blog\" data-secret=\"ipxT5fnw5Q\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/blogs.icrc.org\/law-and-policy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/102\/2024\/12\/beyond-prevalence-figure-1.png","thumbnail_width":1292,"thumbnail_height":699,"description":"When discussing the measurement of sexual- and gender-based violence (SGBV) prevention in humanitarian settings, reactions often polarize around two main arguments: that measurement is impossible (\u201cHow can we measure what hasn\u2019t happened?\u201d), or that prevalence alone signals success (\u201cDo you have data showing decreased perpetration?\u201d). Both perspectives overlook the complexity of SGBV prevention \u2013 and..."}